1-888-PLUG-N-GO

Securing a Cost-efficient Turnaround Process for Oil Plants


#Shutdowns|Turnarounds

With capital investment projects being the primary focus of senior management in the petroleum industry, the potential business impact of facility turnarounds is frequently underestimated or altogether disregarded. In 2013, the total capital expenditure in the Oil Sands, Alberta alone totalled $31 billion, while operating costs were not far behind at $24 billion[1]. Since the Oil Sands, and Alberta in general, has historically been a high-cost area with plenty of space for performance improvement, decreasing the share of operating costs, largely attributed to turnaround spending, should gain priority in the management decision-making process[2].

Both industry and location pose their individual challenges on turnaround efficiency in the region. The Oil Sands area petrochemical facilities have among the highest in complexity and largest in scope upgrade turnarounds in the entire industry. Since these are usually performed in windows of up to 60 days, the costs associated with upgrading operations may amount to tens of million dollars per day over the shutdown period. On the other hand, geography makes it difficult to attend to the logistics of such large projects and attracting skilled labour in the area is difficult due to the remote location and specific environment. These factors together make turnarounds in Alberta among the most expensive in the world[2].

Another major challenge of the turnaround process lies in planning ahead for plant shutdowns. Since planning should start at least 6 months prior to feed-out, it is easy to freeze the turnaround budget before examining the adequacy of scope. As a result, considerable work tasks are discovered and added even after the shutdown has begun, resulting in schedule and budget overruns. Due to the unique nature of the refining industry, a single day of lost opportunities due to poorly planned plant shutdown may significantly run in excess of the allocated maintenance budget. Finally, in looking to optimize both budget and schedule, some turnaround managers set unrealistic targets that are not aligned with the reality of the maintenance work being planned.

Based on these specific challenges petroleum plants face across Alberta, there are a number of strategies that can secure a timely and cost-efficient turnaround process.

  • Senior management involvement – If the top management does not recognize the business impact of poorly executed maintenance shutdowns, there will always be a substantial discrepancy between budgeting and scheduling and the actual costs and work involved in a turnaround.
  • Early planning – While it used to be an industry standard to start preparing for a plant shutdown 6 to 9 months in advance, recent recommendations state that a complex turnaround should take 15 to 18 months to plan effectively[2]. An early start to the planning process ensures a correct diagnosis of the necessary work, as well as procuring the necessary materials, equipment and skilled labour.
  • Smooth integration across departments – Capital projects and maintenance work need to be effectively coordinated and communicated across all levels of staff involvement. When everyone is aware of the impact of their individual and team contribution to the process, both planning and execution can be optimized in the organization.
  • Effective control over scope – Since determining the scope of the project is among the key drivers behind a successful turnaround, enough time should be devoted to identifying areas of work for each specific turnaround cycle to avoid late additions and changes, which always have an adverse effect on turnaround schedule and budget.

The petroleum sector is ever-expanding in the Oil Sands, Alberta and the competition among plants dictates effective handling of operational costs, including turnaround spending. A well-defined scope, actively involved management and a thorough, well-coordinated planning process have the potential to make a difference in each individual plant’s cost-effectiveness.

Sources:

1. Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, Statistical Handbook, October 2014
2. Schroeder, Brett, and John Crager. "The Importance of Turnarounds to Business Success for the Oil Sands." Asset Performance Canada (n.d.): n. pag.

SUBSCRIBE FOR ACCESS TO EXCLUSIVE CONTENT.

By checking this box you are giving Trinity Power express consent to send you commercial emails.

RELATED POSTS

The 15th Annual Shutdowns and Turnarounds Superconference: Why You Can't Afford to Miss It
Learn More

Welcome to the Rodeo: GPS is Coming to Calgary
Learn More

Woodfibre LNG Announcement Echoes LNG Conference Message: LNG's Future in BC is Alive and Well
Learn More

Highlights From The 2015 Global Petroleum Show
Learn More

Critical Steps To Plan For In Plant Turnarounds
Learn More